Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 15 - Jul 20
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Domaines Schlumberger Pinot BlancMet deze zeer bekende witte wijn gemaakt van de Pinot Blanc druif heeft Domaines Schlumberger de wereld veroverd. De oprichter van dit familie wijnhuis is de Duitser Claus Schlumberger die in de zestiende eeuw vanuit Duitsland in de Elzas terecht kwam. Hij vestigde zich in het stadje Guebwiller maar lang kon hij niet genieten van zijn plek, de regio werd overheerst door de Princes Abbs monniken. Hij verhuisde naar een andere stad waar hij zijn
Met deze zeer bekende witte wijn gemaakt van de Pinot Blanc druif heeft Domaines Schlumberger de wereld veroverd. De oprichter van dit familie wijnhuis is de Duitser Claus Schlumberger die in de zestiende eeuw vanuit Duitsland in de Elzas terecht kwam. Hij vestigde zich in het stadje Guebwiller maar lang kon hij niet genieten van zijn plek, de regio werd overheerst door de Princes Abbés monniken. Hij verhuisde naar een andere stad waar hij zijn bezittingen over droeg aan zijn zoon Nicolas Schlumberger. Hij bouwde in 1810 wijnkelders en kocht een twintig hectare grote wijngaard die later de grote wijnen zou voeden. Ook Nicolas kreeg veel kinderen om precies te zijn wel negen waarbij Jean Schlumberger het roer over nam van zijn vader. De liefde voor de Alsace is groot in de familie en vandaag de dag wordt alles nog steeds gerund door de familie Schlumberger.De oogst van de Pinot Blanc
De wijngaarden voor deze Pinot Blanc liggen voornamelijk in de plaatsen Saering & Spiegel, evenals in de plaatsen Bux en Bollenberg. Door de diverse percelen is de wijn altijd constant en krijgt de wijnmaker unieke druiven binnen. Het perfecte klimaat wat heerst in de wijngaarden geeft de oogst veel zon licht maar ook verkoeling. De koelte is afkomstig van de wind maar ook van de sterk dalende nacht temperaturen. Zo groeien de Pinot Blanc druiven gelijkmatig en rijpt hij fantastisch. De oogst voor de Pinot Blanc wordt geheel met de hand binnen gehaald en streng gecontroleerd. Vervolgens rijpt deze Pinot Blanc maar liefst zeven maanden op de Lie in de kelders van Domaines Schlumberger. En dat maakt het verschil met een willekeurige andere Pinot Blanc! Vol en zeer aromatisch.Vol en zeer krachtig deze Schlumberger Pinot Blanc
Bij het inschenken van deze Schlumberger Pinot Blanc zien we een prachtige heldere kleur met groene schittering. In de geur een fantastisch rijk boeket van appel, citrusvruchten (citroen) en een lichte bloemige hint van witte bloemen. De smaak is fantastisch een mooie klassieke Pinot Blanc stijl met verfrissende smaken op de tong van appel, peer en limoen maar ook wat grapefruit. Later als de wijn even in de mond is proeven wij ook lichte nuances van citrus en brem. De afdronk is lang en verfrissend met alle mooie eigenschappen van de Pinot Blanc druif.Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 804 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
You don't have to like Justice Scalia to like his book.
Perhaps an appellate brief that you wrote would have been perfect if only the judge had read it. The lesson you learned, hopefully, was that there is no guarantee that a judge will read your brief. The lesson you can learn from "Making Your Case" is how to write so that the judges will read what you wrote - preferably before your oral argument. Writing in a quite candid, lucid and entertaining style, Scalia and Garner serve up tips that even the most experienced lawyers can learn from. If you find yourself approaching the court's word limit, for example, you may be minimizing the chances of having your brief read, as judges really do favor brevity. How do you write for a court that is notoriously dismissive of higher court precedents? How do you best respond to a judge who asks whether you would be content with a remand? These and other critical questions are addressed simply yet insightfully. If your legal education stressed the IRAC approach (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion), Scalia and Garner take you a step further by stressing a syllogistic approach. Even if you have already been exposed to all the best ideas about persuading appellate judges, you are still likely to gain much rom reading "Making Your Case" because the authors organize all those ideas in a way that makes them much easier to remember and keep them in mind as you prepare your written and oral arguments. Justice Scalia calls his approach to legal reasoning and argument "textualism," which I understand to mean that his decisions are driven by the language of the law and of the case. My impression from reading many of his decisions is that he is often driven by ideology, so I can't quite square his book with his decisions. I also question the book's fundamental statement that the overriding objective of a brief is to make the court's job easier, as I prefer to write primarily for the purpose of winning the case. My criticisms of "Making Your Case" are miniscule compared to those thrown at it by Richard Posner. But although I find Judge Posner's decisions generally more fair than those of Justice Scalia, I prefer the clarity of Justice Scalia's writing - especially when he teams up with Bryan Garmer. Judge Posner notwithstanding, Scalia and Garner have put together a gem that is likely to prove invaluable for law students as well as for trial and appellate lawyers who are still interested in improving their game. If you fall into either category, buy this book, read it two or three times, and then keep it handy as a reference. It should help you make your case.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 18, 2012
★★★★★ 5
A Great Read... (for those in the legal field)
A great gift for those in the legal field. We ordered several for gifts throughout the year.. Made a great little gift basket with a bottle of whiskey :)
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 20, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Elegant, useful
Simply the best book on legal persuasive writing ever written.
Interesting, useful, fun, full of great anecdotes. Terrific discussion of statutory interpretation. Great references to scholarly classical treatises on rhetoric. This book is wonderful both for its analysis of oral argument and for its discussion of written forms of persuasion, like briefs. I wish I had had it earlier.
My only complaint is the same one I have with virtually all modern style manuals: they advocate a simplistic prose style, characterized by short, conversational sentences, avoiding unusual words, eschewing Latin phrases. But I personally often find prose that breaks these rules a refreshing change. I enjoy reading a word or phrase I rarely see but that is perfectly chosen. And I enjoy learning new words or phrases. This book would condemn two of the greatest legal prose stylists out there: John Marshall and Learned Hand, both of whose opinions often contained sentences that would not work so well conversationally, that were full of long, convoluted sentences and classical allusions. My sense is that in this joint work Justice Scalia, who can write rich and interesting prose, pushed back against some of the simplifying strictures of his co-author.
Furthermore, I think that often too much emphasis on simple words and sentences serves to make more complex ideas too difficult to express or to understand. Thus, the book (like most books) argues against "jargon," but jargon, once learned, is often a much clearer way of expressing something than a rephrasing.
And the Roe v. Wade anecdote is great! It explains a lot...
In any case, I am hardly qualified to criticize Justice Scalia, whose writing is far beyond my own. Anyway, this is a great book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2008
★★★★★ 5
Recomendado para todo estudiante de Derecho
Libro fácil de leer y fácil de comprender. Recomendado
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 2, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Wonderful and useful book.
Format: Kindle
I am very glad I purchased this book. I used it over and over again. Wrote many notes and it added much value to pursue my cases at courts. This is a true asset for providing an overall overview with much advice.
I also purchased his other book The Winning Brief, but that is only available in paper format and it is mainly for linguistic help in writing briefs for appellate court, for the purpose of really perfecting your writing. At lower courts or supreme courts you just do not have the time to think in that much details and these courts may not even read it. You are lucky if you can say two sentences on court appearances. They do not put that much into details when making judgments, so most likely your case ends up in the appellate, and here that book becomes valuable too - The Winning Brief.
Again, this book really excellent and pleasant to read. The Kindle version was easy to search for anything, word, phrase, notes.
5 star book. THANKS.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 19, 2018
recommand products
trak specials pins lives pivot blk 10pk 74168b 1
39.95
RF4 RF-FT07 Reparatie-armatuur voor moederborden met dubbele as en hoge temperatuurbestendigheid, versterkt glas
35.61
BEST-130 Plaatreparatie voor mobiele telefoons Moederbord vaste beugel
23.58
trw clutch lives bk mk1230s 5
43.95
JIAFA JF-609-2.5 holle kruistip 2.5 middelste montageschroevendraaier (groen)
23.73